Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology"
From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: Helmut Richter: "Re: There are uncountably many irrationals"
- Previous message: Bill Smythe: "Re: How many digits is pi computable to?"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:03:43 +0100
examachine@gmail.com writes:
> Where did Hardy claim that there is a clear-cut boundary between pure
> and applied?
>
> > It is not too hard to see that it is a presupposition in his apology.
> >
Bull***.
One can discuss pure mathematics and applied mathematics without
assuming a "clear-cut boundary" between the two.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be, and
if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!"
-- Lewis Carroll
- Next message: Helmut Richter: "Re: There are uncountably many irrationals"
- Previous message: Bill Smythe: "Re: How many digits is pi computable to?"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]