Re: Question about President's Social Security plan
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: james: "Re: Adjoined fields"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- In reply to: Les Cargill: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- Next in thread: Les Cargill: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:20:50 GMT
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:19:38 GMT, Les Cargill <lNOcargill@cfl.Arr.com>
wrote:
>royls@telus.net wrote:
><snip>
>>>Spend a zillion dollars on an aircraft
>>>carrier and you provide some jobs while she is being built aftwer which she is
>>>a drain on the economy returning nothing. Spend the same on a fleet of
>>>freighters or ocean liners or cruise ships -- or Lear jets -- and you provide
>>>jobs and income generation for the life of those vessels.
>>
>> Garbage. Freighters, OK, they are transporting goods. Cruise ships
>> are productive capital for the entertainment/hospitality/tourism
>> industry. But private jets are a pretty much pure consumption item, a
>> status symbol that provides no more return on investment than typical
>> military expenditures.
>
>There exist people for whom private jets are more
>sensible than flying coach. For some people, the
>time spent waiting for flights can be a very real
>sunk cost over and above their time. Blackberries
>and cellphones help, but are not the whole story.
I agree there are a handful of cases where private jets make economic
sense, but they are overwhelmingly just luxury status symbols.
-- Roy L
- Next message: james: "Re: Adjoined fields"
- Previous message: Eugene Shubert: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- In reply to: Les Cargill: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- Next in thread: Les Cargill: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|