Re: Finite Permutation Groups
mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Date: 01/18/05
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: David Einstein: "Re: JSH: Math society against amateurs"
- In reply to: Lorenzo: "Finite Permutation Groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:09:58 +0000 (UTC)
In article <200501181106.j0IB69e07939@proapp.mathforum.org>,
poinsot@univ-tln.fr (Lorenzo) writes:
>Hi!
>
>I would like to know if the two following properties are true and in this case, if anyone has a proof of them.
>
>Thanks.
>
>1) If a group G acts regularly on a finite Abelian group H then G is Abelian itself;
I presume you mean that G acts regualrly on the nonidentity elements of H ?
Is so, then the answer is no.
The smallest example is H = C_3 x C_3, G = Q_8.
>2) If a group G acts sharply 2-transitively on a finite Abelian group H then G is NONABELIAN.
This is true except for a few trivial examples, like H = C_3, G = C_2,
and H = C_2 or C_1, G = C_1.
By the way, if G acts transitively on the non-identity elements of any
finite group H, then H is abelian.
Derek Holt.
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: David Einstein: "Re: JSH: Math society against amateurs"
- In reply to: Lorenzo: "Finite Permutation Groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]