Re: Factoring problem, solved
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ?"
- Previous message: KRamsay: "Re: Constructivists and existence proofs"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Factoring problem, solved"
- Next in thread: Mack: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Reply: Mack: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:30:51 -0800
> The idea may seem pathetically simple, but that is because ...
Well, I was thinking less about the idea seeming pathetically simple but
rather moer about you seeming pathetically simple.
> I have just shown you in a few lines how to factor an arbitrary
> non-zero positive integer M in polynomial time.
Where did you prove anything about polynomial time?
> That code implements a VERSION of my own theory, as I
> don't factor both j and T, but only T, as j gets background factored by
> the mathematics.
What do you mean by "j gets background factored by the mathematics"?
> It is CRITICAL that the information be taken seriously as soon as
> possible so that some other method can be used for Internet security,
> and quickly implemented.
Yawn............
> Time is a factor.
Time is a factor? I thought it was a composite.
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: How many flips of DIAG are on the infintie list of infinite con flippers ?"
- Previous message: KRamsay: "Re: Constructivists and existence proofs"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Factoring problem, solved"
- Next in thread: Mack: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Reply: Mack: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|