Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: LordBeotian: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Previous message: gjoneshtfc_at_volcanomail.com: "Re: Minimum of multi-dimensional functions"
- In reply to: Lasse: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Reply: abe.buckingham_at_gmail.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:54:00 +1000
> Hope this helps,
> Lasse
No, that is the biggest load of bollocks in history, I can't believe you all swallow it.
All you have to do is answer the questions properly. That means giving the answer
that was asked for, using suitable meanings for the terms.
If you want to discuss your extremely stupid stance on real numbers, do it by arguing
the true or false value of one of the propositions that I disagree with you on.
Strange you can know everything there is to know and you don't have to even bother
seeing if cardinality theory holds up to inspection. You win both ways! Well done!
Herc
- Next message: LordBeotian: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Previous message: gjoneshtfc_at_volcanomail.com: "Re: Minimum of multi-dimensional functions"
- In reply to: Lasse: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Reply: abe.buckingham_at_gmail.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
