Re: monty hall
From: Timothy Little (tim-via-n.i.net_at_little-possums.net)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Easy probability question"
- Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: Easy probability question"
- In reply to: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: monty hall"
- Next in thread: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: monty hall"
- Reply: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: monty hall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Jan 2005 23:13:15 GMT
clintonz@prodigy.net wrote:
> Wrongggggg!!!!!!!!
How rude.
> If two contestatns participate then one door is designated
> as protected.
A different problem again, this one lacking the symmetry of the
earlier poster's formulation. To repeat: "It is no surprise that
applying a different problem's solution will give nonsensical
results."
- Tim
- Next message: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Easy probability question"
- Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: Easy probability question"
- In reply to: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: monty hall"
- Next in thread: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: monty hall"
- Reply: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: monty hall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|