Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- In reply to: abe.buckingham_at_gmail.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:30:01 +1000
> And why wouldn't we swallow it? It's a made up object that obeys
> certain properties that we define and then build from logically just
> like all of math. Whatever philosophical reasons you have for
> rejecting them aren't any less convincing. If you think a contradiction
> exists, it's your responsibility to prove it but just because you don't
> like the idea doesn't mean it's not a valid way to math. Frankly I'd
> take that load of bollocks over your ill-defined drivel any day even if
> it had a contradiction, because it's at least articulate. When you will
> realize that math is about one thing - convincing your peers. That's
> why the rely so heavily on logic and rules of inference which are
> widely agreed upon, and the fact that you can't get anyone to believe
> your claims is a pretty solid reason for rejecting them.
>
rubbish. assume all oo reals on a list.
ignore the assumption and construct a new real "different to every other real".
by definition , there are oo + 1 reals.
therefore hyperinfinity exists.
that's your articulate proof. its the century of gooey over it you admire not the
existance of a hyperinfinity.
Infinite people flips coins infinite times each.
take the diagonal, invert it.
a new sequence.
just ignore the fact that sequence has been flipped to oo number of coin tosses.
Herc
- Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Fasincating behavior, reaction to my work"
- In reply to: abe.buckingham_at_gmail.com: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
