Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0"
- Previous message: Ari: "Re: Calculus is making me ill"
- In reply to: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Next in thread: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Reply: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:12:58 +1000
<rupertmccallum@yahoo.com> wrote in
>
> |-|erc wrote:
> > > "If you have the list of computables, a random real number can be
> on it to an infinite number
> > > of digits, and yet not be on the list" True / False / Other
> >
>
> It's possible that for each k, the real agrees with some member of the
> list to k digits, but that the real is not on the list.
>
.......therefore true?
........therefore false?
BE ASSERTIVE MAN!
Its not newspeak I wish to clarify, its using English for proper comprehension that
your syntax seems unable to grasp.
Herc
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: HERC 97 SCI.MATH 0"
- Previous message: Ari: "Re: Calculus is making me ill"
- In reply to: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Next in thread: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Reply: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: WELL WHICH IS IT... ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
