Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis

From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 01/22/05 

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:54:39 -0600

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:50:10 -0500, "Douglas A. Gwyn"
<DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:

>[...] It's not hard to come
>up with incorrect, inefficient factoring methods.

Oh? A google search on "incorrect, inefficient factoring methods"
returns no hits

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22incorrect%2C+inefficient+factoring+methods%22

And searching usenet for the same phrase gives only one hit, your post
(of course soon it will return this post as well):

http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?as_epq=incorrect%2C%20inefficient%20factoring%20methods&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&lr=&hl=en

Maybe you should check the facts first before spouting off?

Giggle.

************************

David C. Ullrich

Relevant Pages