Re: Factoring problem, solved
From: Richard Henry (rphenry_at_home.com)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: sherifffruitfly_at_gmail.com: "Re: software for plotting equations not arranged into y = f(x) format"
- Previous message: Richard Henry: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:51:36 -0800
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1106423058.760806.43290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Gregory G Rose wrote:
> > In article <1106413314.802408.288300@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > <jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
> > >More than likely the correct number is greater than 90% factoring,
> and
> > >the heavy recursion of my program hides how well the algorithm
> works.
> >
> > A couple of days ago you were asserting that the
> > 50% number came from Quadratic Residues, and that
> > you'd proved it. Well, either you're wrong now, or
> > your proof was wrong then. We can't tell, because
> > of course all you wrote then was gibberish.
> >
>
> Bull***.
Correction noed.
- Next message: sherifffruitfly_at_gmail.com: "Re: software for plotting equations not arranged into y = f(x) format"
- Previous message: Richard Henry: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: Factoring problem, solved"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]