Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum
From: Xcott Craver (caj_at_B-r-a-i-n-H-z.com)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Bart Goddard: "Re: Start"
- Previous message: Prai Jei: "Re: Democratic voters will soon be rounded up"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: Mark Nudelman: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:24:14 GMT
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
>Mark Nudelman wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure why that's astounding. There are lots of algorithms
>> that factor numbers 100% of the time.
>
>Yeah but my algorithm does it in polynomial time.
Then, factor an RSA challenge.
If it works 50% of the time, try it on a bunch of challenge
numbers, and give us the factors of at least one.
If you had such an algorithm, it would be incredibly easy to
prove it by doing the above.
>James Harris
--Xcott
- Next message: Bart Goddard: "Re: Start"
- Previous message: Prai Jei: "Re: Democratic voters will soon be rounded up"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: Mark Nudelman: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading