Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum
From: Nora Baron (norabaron_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Jan 2005 11:27:11 -0800
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> Mark Nudelman wrote:
> > jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> > > The original algorithm in my program, will, my current analysis
> shows,
> > > factor about 50% of the time, which is astounding.
> >
> > I'm not sure why that's astounding. There are lots of algorithms
> that
> > factor numbers 100% of the time.
> >
>
> Yeah but my algorithm does it in polynomial time.
>
What degree polynomial?
Nora B.
>
> James Harris
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
