Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics
From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Benchmark challenge"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:37:20 +0100
examachine@gmail.com writes:
> I think I was trolling a bit[...]
Ya think?
> because I insistently asked Torkel to explain his position but he
> was smart enough to avoid giving the title away. I think it's some
> kind of logicism. I suspect he may be believing in even a scholastic
> version of metaphysics, in which every fundamental matter was
> decided by medieval doctors.
What a stupid guess.
-- Jesse F. Hughes "Radicals are interesting because they were considered 'radical' by the people who played with them who wrote a lot of math work that modern mathematics depends on." --Another JSH history lesson
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Benchmark challenge"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]