Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 01/24/05 

Date: 23 Jan 2005 16:05:24 -0800

José Carlos Santos wrote:
> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>
> > If that prototype had worked as well as I'd hoped, I wouldn't be
> > posting about it.
>
> And if pigs had wings, they would fly.
>
>

Are you sure?

That prototype didn't work as well as I'd hoped. That's just a
reality.

But it does work. It does factor.

The method I use is very original, while your reply is not.

I have a theory, with a paper outlining the theory, and a prototype
program showing that the equations in the paper are correct and that
*something* is in fact happening.

You are a babbling boob talking about flying pigs.

See the difference?

You produce nothing. I put the information out there: mathematics and
a program.

You talk saying nothing of value. I talk from a mathematical
foundation.

You are just some dumb-ass I feel like replying to, while I am the
discoverer.

You are nothing but someone I can use to vent upon.
So I vent, and you exist. Your life has purpose.

James Harris

Quantcast