Re: ******* TRY THESE SCI.MATH **********

From: |-|erc (H_at_r.c)
Date: 01/24/05 

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:35:39 +1000

<rupertmccallum@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> |-|erc wrote:
> > <rupertmccallum@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > > |-|erc wrote:
> > > > <rupertmccallum@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > > Yes they would, and anyway this is irrelevant. The question is
> > > whether
> > > > > or not you understand it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > liar
> > > >
> > > > Herc
> > >
> > > What do you say I'm lying about? How about telling me whether you
> > > understand what I'm saying or not. That might move the discussion
> > > forward.
> > >
> >
> > When you are corrected, you ignore it, retaliate, call it ridiculous,
> change the topic,
> > and try to skip over it.
>
> In what sense did I change the topic? You mean I changed it from the
> topic of how bad my grammar was? Is this what you're accusing me of
> evading?

The topic is getting the assertions into English grammatical propositions.

>
> You weren't correcting me, you were just being abusive. If you think
> you can point out a mistake in my grammar, go ahead. It's hardly
> relevant though, is it?

I told you 'k' and 'r' are not words, hence you are not writing English sentences.

There's no rebuttal to this. You admit your error, support your assertion somehow
or stop posting.

>
> > I don't want to move the discussion, quite the opposite, I
> > want the fact oo digits of a sequence get computed in order stated
> clearly and
> > understood, its a very simple proposition that not 1 of 1,000
> sci.maths subscribers
> > will admit to, except John Savard.
> >
>
> Okay, what exactly is this fact that you want understood? Are you
> saying every sequence is computable? Why do you expect people to agree
> with this? What arguments do you have to offer in its favour? Are you
> aware of the proof that not every sequence is computable? What do you
> have to say about that?

All I'm saying is what amount of the digits of the sequence HAVE PROPERTY XYZ.

Its a simple question about the single sequence, the answer has nothing to do with XYZ.

I don't care HOW the digits are placed, I don't care WHERE the digits are placed, I
don't care how many PER ROW are placed.

sequence <.......................> linear object

list
<
<............>
<............>
<............>
>
compound object.

How many digits of the linear object have property XYZ?

You have 2 choices, finite or infinite.

"any finite amount per computable number" is NOT HALF WAY.

THERE IS NO INBETWEEN. INFINITE OR FINITE.

HOW MANY DIGITS OF LINEAR OBJECT = INFINTIE | FINITE

NO CLAUSE NO IFS NO BUTS

>
> > When the question is HOW MANY DIGITS, the answer is not ANY, its a
> quantity.
> > "ANY FINITE" is like "not-guilty-criminal", its meaningless.
> >
> > Herc
>

Herc