Re: Convergent?
From: Herman Rubin (hrubin_at_odds.stat.purdue.edu)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Herman Rubin: "Re: 2680 challenge"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- In reply to: Eamon Warnock: "Convergent?"
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Convergent?"
- Reply: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Convergent?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Jan 2005 13:31:47 -0500
In article <320feecd4eef0f2e55cb6533abf8d7b4.61944@mygate.mailgate.org>,
Eamon Warnock <ewarnock@gz.cngb.com> wrote:
>Prove the convergence or otherwise of
>1/1 + 1/2(1+log2) + 1/3(1+log3)(1+log(1+log3)) +
>1/4(1+log4)(1+log(1+log4))(1+log(1+log(1+log4))) + ...
As stated, the series diverges, because the iterations
of "1+log()" become much less than 1.
-- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
- Next message: Herman Rubin: "Re: 2680 challenge"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- In reply to: Eamon Warnock: "Convergent?"
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Convergent?"
- Reply: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Convergent?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|