Re: JSH: Nearly done
From: Sebastian Gottschalk (seppi_at_seppig.de)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: JSH: Explaining surrogate factoring, again"
- Previous message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Nearly done"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Reply:(deleted message) jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:17:36 +0100
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Wow, you parents gave you a really bad name.
> All of that is easy to prove, and not only did I prove it in a paper, I
> wrote a program that does it.
>
> See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sufactor/
Please have a look a close look at it.
Essentially you've found a complicated way to rewrite the already
well-known Quadratic Sieve. You just need to reconvert your formulas to
have single squareroots on one side, square them and inset some of your
substitions.
> James Harris
Oh, yeah, this guy. Will you ever get away from your squares and your "It
is not clear to me at this point what the best values for A, k, and
T are, but they are chosen arbitrarily."? :-P
-- Dieser Schrieb stellt eine private Meinungsäußerung des Verfassers im Sinne der gesetzlich garantierten Meinungsfreiheit dar. Wem das nicht passt, der wende sich an das Bundesverfassungsgericht. Viel Erfolg! Key: 0xA0E28D18 FP: 83AE 1136 1E2B 9767 8FB2 7594 4128 1A9E A0E2 8D18
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: JSH: Explaining surrogate factoring, again"
- Previous message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Nearly done"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Reply:(deleted message) jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|