Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity

From: Timothy Little (tim-via-n.i.net_at_little-possums.net)
Date: 01/25/05


Date: 25 Jan 2005 06:16:59 GMT

Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> if you have a sequence with infinitely many ones and zero you can
> generate most irrationals, and half of the possible sequences.

Actually, you can get all real numbers if you're have a wide enough
deefinition of "reorder".

For example, define a "reordering" to be an injective map f:N->N where
f(n) is the position in the old sequence from which you get the n'th
element in the new. For any finite set of labels, such a "reordering"
is bijective. For infinite sets of labels, it need not be.

> That consideration of sampling real numbers is digression from the
> point about measure theory and probability: that the utility is
> primarily about the cardinality of the continuum and continua, and thus
> the basically geometric nature of the continuum instead of its
> cardinality, and that it could be explained that way.

Not at all. Many of the functions I talk about aren't even defined
over the reals, let alone dependent upon their geometric structure.

> So, aside from that digression, if I want to support measure
> theoretical results or provide alternate mechanisms for correct results
> using my little theory where infinite sets are equivalent, then it
> would lead to some retrofitted underpinnings of measure theory as
> necessary

Definitely. All of analysis to begin with.

> I wonder: is there any use in meaure of transfinite cardinality
> besides the cardinality of the continuum?

Cardinality of the powerset of the continuum is certainly used; I
don't personally recall encountering explicit use of cardinalities
larger than that.

> Second: does probability theory use transfinite cardinals besides
> using measure theory?

As I was taught it, probability theory *is* measure theory for a
particular class of measures.

- Tim



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dial 999 for the real number line
    ... Since "the continuum" in mathematics simply means the real line, ... For this is where set theory tries to get to grips with sequence. ... existence of an infinite set. ... Identity Paradox. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Dial 999 for the real number line
    ... continuum. ... No, for the n-th time, you are misusing the word "sequence". ... meaning of 'infinite', but in the light of the above, I will defer taking ... Identity Paradox. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An easy argumentation to show a severe limitation of set theory
    ... is the n-th element of the sequence S. ... Then A is an infinite set, but N is not a member of A. ... cardinality). ... a finite set. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity
    ... transfinite cardinality are countability vis-a-vis the cardinality of ... That's because of issues dealing with "zero ... 1/2 as the average of 1/3 and 2/3, or an infinite number of zeros is ... primarily about the cardinality of the continuum and continua, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity
    ... transfinite cardinality are countability vis-a-vis the cardinality of ... That's because of issues dealing with "zero ... 1/2 as the average of 1/3 and 2/3, or an infinite number of zeros is ... primarily about the cardinality of the continuum and continua, ...
    (sci.logic)