Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity
From: Ross A. Finlayson (raf_at_tiki-lounge.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Michael Brown: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Previous message: Don Taylor: "Re: Need hints for a problem about primes."
- In reply to: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Next in thread: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Reply: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Jan 2005 23:52:32 -0800
About the infinite binary sequences, there are definitely
considerations to be made about the density of the elements, and
restrictions on the sequence element interchange in permutation.
There's only one sequence of binary digits that represents the number
zero.
I'm hoping you would briefly summarize, in an obvious way, the
functions you mention not defined over the reals, and the utility of
transfinite cardinals. For many, the lack of applications of
transfinite cardinals for solving real-world problems is the (a)
primary source of apathy about them. I have just been very casually
examining the measure theoretical foundations and have not seen
non-geometric examples.
I'm not a geometer, but I notice that geometry is very useful in
solving real-world problems.
You say all of analysis is under measure theory, or that it's
expressible in terms of measure theory. Where analysis is the integral
calculus, is not that all about functions on the real (and complex,
hypercomplex) numbers? A lot of people do integral calculus without
regard of measure theory. I don't think of functional domains in the
integral calculus without geometric structure.
Could you provide an example of the use of the powerset of the
continuum? Do you have an example of an analytical result over a
non-empty domain of measure zero with a geometric analog? That is to
say, is there a simple example of a set with measure zero leading to a
result that is any different than that for an empty set, and derivable
by other means, or are all sets of measure zero the empty set?
Searching for information about "zero probability", "infinitesimal
probabilities", "nonstandard measure theory", "nonstandard
probability", leads to some discussion of intuitive and also
counterintuitive results in measure theory. When I ask about "complex
measure theory" I'm asking about "multivariate" and "multidimensional
measure theory." I hear buzz about these "probability density
functions."
There are everywhere reals between zero and one. They're not "only"
real numbers, but they're all real numbers.
Hey thanks, that helps me understand. Regards,
Ross Finlayson
- Next message: Michael Brown: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- Previous message: Don Taylor: "Re: Need hints for a problem about primes."
- In reply to: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Next in thread: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Reply: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|