Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: help using Mathematica"
- In reply to: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:31:16 GMT
In article <35n52cF4p97h3U3@individual.net>, "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> writes:
>
>
>Jason wrote:
>>
>> Exhaustion and testing by algorithm is not so formal. The computer has to be
>> trusted to be doing the right task. I don't know about yours, but my computer
>> is not to be trusted at the best of times. Let alone the software I write...
>
>Von Neuman proved that an arbitrarily reliable automaton could be
>constructed from unreliable parts, as long as the errors were
>statistically independent.
>
>If you want high reliability go to an engineer. If you want certainty,
>go to church.
>
:-)))))
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Why we cannot compute omega"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: help using Mathematica"
- In reply to: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|