Re: Random reals are not computable!
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Yuzuru Hiraga: "C(n, k): binomial coefficient calculation"
- Previous message: Bill Taylor: "Re: Buffon Laplace Needle Problem."
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jan 2005 06:57:55 +0100
examachine@gmail.com writes:
> There is no such thing as the Turing-equivalence of two numbers that I
> know of,
It means they have the same Turing degree.
- Next message: Yuzuru Hiraga: "C(n, k): binomial coefficient calculation"
- Previous message: Bill Taylor: "Re: Buffon Laplace Needle Problem."
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
