Re: (sketch of a) Proof that the set of Real Numbers doesn't exist

From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 01/26/05 

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:52:30 +0100

albstorz@gmx.de writes:

> Hi,
>
> The set of real numbers doesn't exist. The set theorie assumes the
> existence of distinguishible objects - sets and elements of sets. The
> reals are not distinguishible. E.g. there is no real next to another
> number.

"Distinguishible" [sic] means "next to another number"?

Golly. 

-- 
"If you have a really big idea, you can get a measure of how big it is
by how much people resist the obvious.  From what I've seen, I have a
REALLY, REALLY, *REALLY*, BIG DISCOVERY!!!"  
                                      --James Harris, on being ignored

Relevant Pages