Re: inverse opeerator
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Nicolas Dickreuter: "financial math: risk neutral valuation question"
- Previous message: phr_at_localhost.localdomain: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- In reply to: Saem T.: "Re: inverse opeerator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:44:23 -0600
On 25 Jan 2005 22:37:58 -0800, saemtuarg@yahoo.it (Saem T.) wrote:
>>Saying "||A-B||_{L(X,Y)} -> 0" doesn't really make sense.
>
>why??
>
>>Yes, it's true that if ||A-B||_{L(X,Y)} is small enough then
>>I-(A-B)A^{-1} is an invertible operator - this has nothing
>>to do with anything except the fact that if ||T|| < 1 then
>>I - T is invertible.
>
>May you explain me the reason for wich ||T|| < 1 then
>I - T is invertible, please ?
Because then the series I + T + T^2 + T^3 + ... converges
in norm.
>>>(note that I = I_Y : Y --> Y denotes the identity operator on Y.)
>>>
>>>May you help me please ?
>
>>With what?
>
>?
>
>>David C. Ullrich
>
>ST
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: Nicolas Dickreuter: "financial math: risk neutral valuation question"
- Previous message: phr_at_localhost.localdomain: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- In reply to: Saem T.: "Re: inverse opeerator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]