Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring
mensanator_at_aol.compost
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- In reply to: Larry Hammick: "Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jan 2005 10:51:43 -0800
Larry Hammick wrote:
> <bobbysim@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1106708081.318507.41970@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > I just finished reading though your paper. I just sort of skimmed
your
> > algebra, but I got the general gyst. However I didn't follow
completly
> > due to time constraints, and before going through it again, could
you
> > please use it on an example? Preferably, see how it works on this
> > number please:
> > 25195908475657893494027183240048398571429282126204
> > 03202777713783604366202070759555626401852588078440
> > 69182906412495150821892985591491761845028084891200
> > 72844992687392807287776735971418347270261896375014
> > 97182469116507761337985909570009733045974880842840
> > 17974291006424586918171951187461215151726546322822
> > 16869987549182422433637259085141865462043576798423
> > 38718477444792073993423658482382428119816381501067
> > 48104516603773060562016196762561338441436038339044
> > 14952634432190114657544454178424020924616515723350
> > 77870774981712577246796292638635637328991215483143
> > 81678998850404453640235273819513786365643912120103
> > 97122822120720357
> >
> > If thats too big a number for now, how about this one?
> > 31074182404900437213507500358885679300373460228427
> > 27545720161948823206440518081504556346829671723286
> > 78243791627283803341547107310850191954852900733772
> > 4822783525742386454014691736602477652346609
> >
> > Thanks.
> Those two have bounties on them:
> http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2093
> I doubt very much that JSH can even factor this:
> 136559246467612200625135091586609781477
> I'll bet he doesn't even know how to verify that it is composite.
He can't even factor 254759. Or any of a thousand other composites
of pairs of 3-digit primes:
http://members.aol.com/mensanator/JSH/JSH_results.htm
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Random reals are not computable!"
- In reply to: Larry Hammick: "Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
