Re: JSH: Nearly done
From: David Kastrup (dak_at_gnu.org)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: LEFTY: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Previous message: Rick Decker: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:10:27 +0100
jstevh@msn.com writes:
> I'm focusing on building a full method that relies only on my work,
> so it has to call itself recursively to factor, and such a method
> can potentially chew through even an RSA challenge type number in
> minutes.
Nonsense.
> Then it's just a matter of iterating through the various
> combinations, which I've figured out are at about 150 million for
> the number generated by the first 1000 primes.
>
> Potentially this method can factor an RSA challenge sized number in
> seconds.
The RSA challenge numbers are a far cry from being in the ballpark of
the first 1000 primes.
> I call that polynomial time.
In short: you are completely talking out of your ass. You are
throwing around runtime numbers which are not based on any actual
runs, you are throwing around success rates that are not based on
actual data, and you are throwing around buzzwords for which you have
no clue about the meaning.
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Next message: LEFTY: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Previous message: Rick Decker: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: JSH: Nearly done"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|