Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation
From: Gib Bogle (bogle_at_ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Next in thread: David Eather: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Reply: David Eather: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:25:41 +1300
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> I'm talking in days, not weeks or months.
Speaking in tongues, more like it.
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Next in thread: David Eather: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Reply: David Eather: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
