Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers

From: fishfry (BLOCKSPAMfishfry_at_your-mailbox.com)
Date: 01/27/05


Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:31:58 -0800

In article <41F8930F.6090309@et.uni-magdeburg.de>,
 Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@et.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote:

> but rather for something fundamentally different from Peirce¹s
> description: ³A continuum is precisely that every part of which has
> parts².

That characterization fails to distinguish between the reals and the
rationals, for example.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: counter example in analysis
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... The continuum of reals cannot be resolved into single points ... rationals and reals in a less abstract, ... Then there is no set that corresponds to the continuum of reals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An infinite debate
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... The genuine continuum according to the definition by Peirce "something ... rationals with reals. ... either can be injected into the other, it is trivial to inject the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Non-atomistic continuum: Peirce, Weyl, and?
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... > While traditional analysis considers the continuum as the set of its ... show me the way to the next whiskey bar ... I tell you we must die, I tell you we must die ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Non-atomistic continuum: Peirce, Weyl, and?
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... > While traditional analysis considers the continuum as the set of its ... show me the way to the next whiskey bar ... I tell you we must die, I tell you we must die ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: .999... ?= 1
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... > I understand your lack of understanding. ... > exist in case of the continuum as an integer but like ... Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html ...
    (sci.math)