Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers
From: fishfry (BLOCKSPAMfishfry_at_your-mailbox.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: Alain Verghote: "" Would you mind solving : f(x , y+2) =3*f(x , y) -1 ? ""
- In reply to: Eckard Blumschein: "Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:31:58 -0800
In article <41F8930F.6090309@et.uni-magdeburg.de>,
Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@et.uni-magdeburg.de> wrote:
> but rather for something fundamentally different from Peirce¹s
> description: ³A continuum is precisely that every part of which has
> parts².
That characterization fails to distinguish between the reals and the
rationals, for example.
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: Alain Verghote: "" Would you mind solving : f(x , y+2) =3*f(x , y) -1 ? ""
- In reply to: Eckard Blumschein: "Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: Eckard Blumschein: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|