Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers
From: Eckard Blumschein (blumschein_at_et.uni-magdeburg.de)
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: Andreas Homrighausen: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: Connectedness"
- In reply to: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:59:23 +0100
On 1/27/2005 7:36 PM, guenther.vonKnakspott@gmx.de wrote:
> Do you remember Donald G. Shead, a fellow engineer of
> yours
I never heared this name.
> who kept whining about the advantages of the imperial system of
> measures?
I do not expect you uttering anything of value, and I never came across
with an "imperial system of measures". Imperial = British?
E.
- Next message: Andreas Homrighausen: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: Connectedness"
- In reply to: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]