Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 01/31/05 

Date: 30 Jan 2005 17:09:12 -0800

Now one of the oddest things to me is that you can discover a
mathematical theory, explain it in detail, and have people not believe
you, as I have the full theory for surrogate factoring worked out, but
just haven't gotten a program implementing it to fully work, yet.

But I have the full mathematical theory.

The sad reality is that the mathematics is not enough.

You people sit back, act like it's just nothing, and I tell you the
theory is worked out to a solution to the factoring problem.

Then, I see requests to prove it that involve factoring large numbers.

Since when did it not matter if a person could prove something
mathematically before they could demonsrate it in an implementation?

And it's not like the math is really hard either.

The sad thing is that I'm worried that demonstration of one kind or
another beyond mathematical proof is just around the corner, and then
what?

By then the shock will be so much greater, and it could have been
prevented if any of you could follow a simple mathematical theory, and
accept something as true because it had been proven true
mathematically.

I say, that people harmed in any way, should come to you, as the claim
in the math field is the opposite of what I'm seeing, as the claim is
that mathematical proof is what's important. Some mathematicians even
claim to disdain demonstration or even practical uses to mathematics.

They *claim* that proof is all that matters.

Well, in just a little while the world will be able to see how great
was their lie, as try as I might, I'm not seeing much attention paid to
a very developed theory, which is a solution to the factoring problem.

If demonstration is all you people care for, then I fear that nothing
will happen until demonstration is what you get, and if you're lucky,
it'll be me demonstrating and then maybe something can be done.

If we're unlucky, then the demonstration might come from anywhere in
the world, from maybe even just some small group, smart enough to check
claims such as mine, but not people we'd want with powerful
mathematical tools.

But this is the world I'm stuck with, a world full of lies, where
people often say things they are not, make claims they do not back up,
and act like it never matters.

Sometimes it matters in a very, very, very big way.

I say the world should come to you, if things go badly. I notified the
US Government of my research. I contacted mathematicians around the
world. I've tried my best.

What happens, happens.

James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Theory versus implemention, Im puzzled
    ... But I have the full mathematical theory. ... The sad reality is that the mathematics is not enough. ... that mathematical proof is what's important. ... which is a solution to the factoring problem. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: More perspective, factoring
    ... I have mathematical proof. ... That proof has clear predictions, ... necessary here because the mathematics shows that some mathematical ... solve the factoring problem to force the issue would do it. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, Im puzzled
    ... > But I have the full mathematical theory. ... > theory is worked out to a solution to the factoring problem. ... > that mathematical proof is what's important. ... > claim to disdain demonstration or even practical uses to mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, Im puzzled
    ... > But I have the full mathematical theory. ... > theory is worked out to a solution to the factoring problem. ... > that mathematical proof is what's important. ... > claim to disdain demonstration or even practical uses to mathematics. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: The logic of atheism
    ... >> Ron Peterson wrote: ... >>> particular interpretation of reality. ... of mathematics has an analog in the real world, ...
    (talk.atheism)