Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********
From: |-|erc (H_at_r.c)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Playing with infinities"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: r.e.s.: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:11:25 +1000
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net>
> > So you CANNOT define Omega then?
> >
> > NOBODY IN SCI.MATH CAN DEFINE OMEGA!!!
>
> You win this round. Congratulations! You win an
It's like chewing gum, tacky and sweet.
Herc
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Playing with infinities"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: r.e.s.: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
