Re: JSH: Playing with infinities

rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/31/05 

Date: 30 Jan 2005 18:27:30 -0800

jst...@msn.com wrote:
> I'm going to try and explain one more time, what a simple and elegant
> idea surrogate factoring is, and how exactly it relies on traversal
of
> the entire set of rationals.
>
> Given
>
> yx^2 + Ax - M^2
>
> you trivially have
>
> x(yx + A) = M^2
>
> and there are an *infinite* number of rational solutions for x and y,
> given integers A and M.
>
> That doesn't help you much though, so I went on to
>
> yz^2 + Az - j^2 = 0
>
> where j^2 + T = M^2, and j is just some number you pick in order to
> factor M.
>
> Now, yz^2 + Az - j^2 = 0, also has an infinite number of rational
> solutions for y and z, given integers A and j.
>
> So you have two sets of infinity, and I look at their intersection.
>
> That intersection is given by the non-trivial set of solutions for y,
> such that both requirments are held. That is, such that
>
> yx^2 + Ax - M^2 = 0
>
> and
>
> yz^2 + yz - j^2 = 0
>
> with rational y and x, and integers A, M and j.
>
> It just so happens that the mathematics works out that the
non-trivial
> solutions for y are a finite set determined by the factorization of
>
> A^4 T^4.
>
> It is possible to prove--and rather easy to prove--that the set is
> complete in that it must give a factorization of M.
>
> It must give you a factorization of M.
>

Can you explain why, please?

> That set of rational solutions for y represents the intersection of
two
> infinities, and that is what allows it to always factor M.
>
> Proving that is easy. It's so easy that there's just no excuse for
> mathematicians not believing me, and forcing some implementation to
> take place before they'll acknowledge the truth.
>
> If you people force this to go on because you will not accept
> mathematical proof, then you are complete frauds, and must be, as
> supposedly mathematical proof is what matters to you.
>
> It's not a hard theory.
>
> You can look at the details explained out at
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sufactor/
>
> where I'm also trying to figure out the implementation as I fear that
> only when there's a full demonstration will anyone really listen, as
> you people are not showing you actually care about mathematical
proof.
>
> And the reality of what you think of mathematical proof may hurt a
> tremendous number of people worldwide, as this is not research I can
> control.
>
> Many of you have for years maybe played at being mathematicians
> thinking there was no responsibility attached, but if our economic
> society as we know it goes bye bye because you are really frauds,
> telling the world the factoring problem didn't have such a solution
and
> then sitting around when the mathematical proof was thrust in your
> faces, then it will be your fault.
>
> Playtime is over.
>
> Either you are mathematicians or you're not, and if none of you are,
> when everything changes, then you'll understand that mathematics is
> about the truth, and not about what you wish to believe is true.
>
> I fear you are frauds who know next to nothing about mathematics, but
> instead play silly games with each other with abstruse works you
don't
> even really understand, and you just got caught by forces you can't
> comprehend, and the consequences are far greater than you can, even
> now, imagine.
>
> And it's completely fair.
>
>
> James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Trivially easy math
    ... > compelled to pick ONE WAY to show the factorization, ... > thinking that functions can force constants, ... > The real story here is not difficulty in understanding the mathematics. ... S= set of all possible polynomials of x with coefficients in S ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
    ... Polynomial factorization can be considered to be one of the more boring areas of modern mathematics because so much of what most people think of in factoring polynomials was figured out centuries ago. ... You, Sharma, are a bottom feeder. ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Playing with infinities
    ... It just so happens that the mathematics works out that the non-trivial ... complete in that it must give a factorization of M. ... That set of rational solutions for y represents the intersection of two ... supposedly mathematical proof is what matters to you. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Playing with infinities
    ... > It just so happens that the mathematics works out that the non-trivial ... > complete in that it must give a factorization of M. ... > mathematical proof, then you are complete frauds, and must be, as ... > supposedly mathematical proof is what matters to you. ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Understanding the double bind
    ... There is overwhelming evidence that the research I have now should be ... where the best evidence is the mathematical proof ... that I found relatively simple mathematics that ends the viability of ... where the reason the system can be ...
    (sci.crypt)