Re: Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled
From: David Eather (eather_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian"
- Previous message: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: JSH: Playing with infinities"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:26:56 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> But I have the full mathematical theory...
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I point out, that because you are unable to produce a working
implementation, YOU DO NOT HAVE A THEORY AT ALL - in fact you only
have a hypothesis, and it is wrong.
Theories can be wrong, and proofs can be flawed.
These apply to your "theory" / "work" / faulty hypothesis and are the
true reasons you have been unable to build a working implementation.
Get on with whatever else brings meaning to you. And before you
start, you have no right to whine (as you did last year with the same
surrogate crap) "all that work for nothing ... oh poor me, if only I
could ...."
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQf2XM5S9Fk5okqe7EQJciACeOvnACJ1KRe8yrKmyo9MihaOjvoUAoOS0
OuM/RHrCApmIXr4XZoGVZeKU
=qktp
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQf2XY5S9Fk5okqe7EQInfwCgkOl+NoPEUKoDspgGyp7bkoHZEHsAoKCY
fwnN5MwIkxhuXVoKLYSNNENT
=5Xvn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian"
- Previous message: rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: JSH: Playing with infinities"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
