Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********
From: |-|erc (H_at_r.c)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- In reply to: r.e.s.: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:28:43 +1000
"r.e.s." <r.s@ZZmindspring.com> wrote in ...
> "|-|erc" <H@r.c> wrote ...
>
> > You have no definition for a real valued Omega.
>
> What, specifically, is it that you don't understand
> about my clarification of the definition at MathWorld
> (given earlier in this thread)? Please quote the part
> that's giving you trouble.
>
'its for a particular UTM' .. that's all you said.
This is irrelevant since the sum wont converge for any UTM.
Herc
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- In reply to: r.e.s.: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? ***********"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading