Re: Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled

From: Larry Hammick (larryhammick_at_OMIT-MEtelus.net)
Date: 01/31/05 

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:00:07 GMT

<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1107133752.934996.123670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Now one of the oddest things to me is that you can discover a
> mathematical theory, explain it in detail, and have people not believe
> you, as I have the full theory for surrogate factoring worked out, but
> just haven't gotten a program implementing it to fully work, yet.
>
> But I have the full mathematical theory.
>
> The sad reality is that the mathematics is not enough.
It's hard to believe that you would expect anybody to swallow this ***,
Harris. You've made an exceptionally poor choice of problem on which to
claim (yet again) to have made some earth-shaking discovery. You should have
stuck with FLT. If you can factor a big integer, that means I can give you a
big integer and you can tell me its factors. You cannot. Two integers >1
whose product is any of those RSA challenge numbers -- that would be more
than enough. Two integers, Harris. Not another 5K is your bull***. Two
integers.