Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: Partitions of Reals"
- Previous message: Jim Heckman: "Re: Groups of order 36, 40, 56"
- In reply to: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 02 Feb 2005 08:51:15 +0100
"Jason" <jasonstevensNOSPAM@free.net.nz> writes:
> Most of maths is built from sets, so the basic assumptions of maths
> are the axioms of set theory, in particular ZFC set theory. [Chapter Zero -
> Fundamental Notions of Abstract Mathematics, Carol Schumacher]
However, after Chapter Zero, nobody cares about the axioms of ZFC,
let alone about the rules of predicate logic.
This is not to say that ZFC does not play an important role in
contemporary mathematics.
- Next message: Robert Israel: "Re: Partitions of Reals"
- Previous message: Jim Heckman: "Re: Groups of order 36, 40, 56"
- In reply to: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|