Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 02/05/05
- Next message: Oscar Lanzi III: "Re: volume optimization"
- Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: coin puzzle"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 05 Feb 2005 23:04:54 +0100
"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@phiwumbda.org> writes:
> They're something like formal proofs. In fact, each informal proof in
> ordinary mathematics has a formal analogue in ZFC.
"Analogue" in what sense?
- Next message: Oscar Lanzi III: "Re: volume optimization"
- Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: coin puzzle"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|