Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers
examachine_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Previous message: David Rosoff: "Cohomology of pro-p-groups and Pontryagin duality"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Feb 2005 15:13:54 -0800
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> writes:
>
> > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CantorsParadox.html
>
> So? There is no suggestion on this page that there is any such
thing
> as "Cantor's naive set theory" with a "set of all sets".
Do you know how to read? What is the title of that page? Why do you
think it is called Cantor's paradox? What the heck is naive set theory?
Any clue about history?
-- Eray
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Previous message: David Rosoff: "Cohomology of pro-p-groups and Pontryagin duality"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|