Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?
tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu
Date: 02/07/05
- Next message: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: squash_at_peoriadesignweb.com: "Examples of exponential growth phenomena in nature"
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 07 Feb 2005 03:45:44 GMT
In article <4206e35f$0$577$b45e6eb0@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>, I wrote:
>Expressing "p is prime" is easy: ~(Ex Ey (x+2)*(y+2) = p).
Oops, this should have been: (Ex x+2 = p) & ~(Ex Ey (x+2)*(y+2) = p)
since 0 and 1 are not prime.
-- Tim Chow tchow-at-alum-dot-mit-dot-edu The range of our projectiles---even ... the artillery---however great, will never exceed four of those miles of which as many thousand separate us from the center of the earth. ---Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
- Next message: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: squash_at_peoriadesignweb.com: "Examples of exponential growth phenomena in nature"
- In reply to: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: Torkel Franzen: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
