Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 02/07/05
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Previous message: Volker Hetzer: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:32:09 +0000
examachine@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Torkel Franzen wrote:
>> The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> writes:
>>
>> > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CantorsParadox.html
>>
>> So? There is no suggestion on this page that there is any such
> thing
>> as "Cantor's naive set theory" with a "set of all sets".
>
> Do you know how to read? What is the title of that page? Why do you
> think it is called Cantor's paradox? What the heck is naive set theory?
> Any clue about history?
This is pathetic: one lousy webpage is a definitive guide
to "history" :-(
-- "In Z, are there integers with an infinite number of digits?" Eray Ozkural, sci.math, 11 Sep 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3mokx
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Previous message: Volker Hetzer: "Re: Surrogate factoring, theory versus implementation"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|