Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 02/07/05
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: David Kastrup: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- In reply to: exanews_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: david petry: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:42:56 +0000
exanews@gmail.com wrote:
> it
> should be clear from the outset that it is not science.
It is clear from the outset that mathematics is not science.
It's better than that :-)
-- "In Z, are there integers with an infinite number of digits?" Eray Ozkural, sci.math, 11 Sep 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3mokx
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: David Kastrup: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- In reply to: exanews_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: david petry: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
