Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
stephen_at_nomail.com
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Rick Decker: "Re: Factoring problem, my assertion revisited"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Feb 2005 22:03:22 GMT
In sci.math Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> wrote:
: "Jason" <jasonstevensNOSPAM@free.net.nz> writes:
:>(Man, so many emails, so little time...)
: You can pace your response rate to reduce the burden. Save the
: messages to which you plan to respond. And then wait several hours
: before you actually write your response.
:>Truth has an invested interests in all truth theories that claims to be true.
: It's a bit difficult to make sense of that.
And he claims that "countably infinite" is obfuscatory.
Stephen
- Next message: Rick Decker: "Re: Factoring problem, my assertion revisited"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- In reply to: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|