Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?
examachine_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- In reply to: Ralph Hartley: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Feb 2005 07:59:47 -0800
Ralph Hartley wrote:
> For any number n of connected qbits, and any acceptable error
epsilon, a
> classical machine can simulate the quantum one. But the computational
> effort required grows with decreasing epsilon and grows (almost
certainly
> exponentially) with n.
I haven't seen any proof of exponential speedup, which would just end
all the troubles of computer science. Isn't it more likely that there
is just a polynomial speedup? (Like quadratic)
-- Eray
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- In reply to: Ralph Hartley: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|