Re: Problem with `big oh' estimates in number theory

From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 02/09/05 

Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:29:51 +0000

Angus Rodgers wrote:

> This isn't just some `obvious' point, which he expects
> the mathematically mature reader to work out for him/
> herself.

I think it is ....

> If that were the case, then filling in the
> missing steps of the argument would not have required
> a strengthening of the conclusion of a preceding theorem! 

-- 
Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
  "Elegance is an algorithm"
    Iain M. Banks, _The Algebraist_
Loading