Re: convex hull
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: dumb_founded: "convex hull"
- Next in thread: W. Dale Hall: "Re: convex hull"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:24:33 +0000
dumb_founded wrote:
> If we describe formally the convex hull of a set S as the set that, for
> all y1, y2 member S, (alpha)*y1+(1-alpha)*y2 is a member of the convex
> hull, then will the convex hull, defined in this manner, of S be convex
> necessarily? If not, why not?
You are considering all convex combinations of TWO elements of S.
What if S is the three-element set consiting of the vertices of a triangle?
The two-element convex combinations of S form the perimeter of this
triangle, but the concex hull contains the interior of the triangle too.
A theorem of Caratheodory asserts that is S is a subset of R^n then
the convex hull of S is the set of (n+1)-element convex combinations of
elements of S.
--
Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
"Elegance is an algorithm"
Iain M. Banks, _The Algebraist_
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: dumb_founded: "convex hull"
- Next in thread: W. Dale Hall: "Re: convex hull"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|