Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Martin Johansen: "Re: Pi and the distribution of prime numbers"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:32:49 GMT
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:30:08 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Lester Zick wrote:
>> Correct but it's an easy mistake to make. [beer] is an empirical
>> observation not a proposition. [beer][not beer] is a propostion.
>
>As my 8-th grade English teacher once admonished me. "Always with a
>complete sentence!" Beer is not a declarative sentence.
In universal terms your math is about level of eighth grade English,
Bob. Can't you do anything for yourself except count infinite sets?
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Martin Johansen: "Re: Pi and the distribution of prime numbers"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
