Re: JSH: Easy math, easy solution
From: denis feldmann (denis.feldmann_at_wanadoo.fr)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: 1 QA engineer vs 7 users: opinions about the AXIOM computer algebra system"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Steven: "Re: JSH: Easy math, easy solution"
- Next in thread: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "no insults was Re: JSH: Easy math, easy solution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:52:50 +0100
Steven a écrit :
>>Factorization is quite simple. Here is an algorithm for it.
>>Input: a composite number n.
>>Output: an ordered pair (b,c) such that 1 < b <n, 1 < c < n, and bc =
>
> n.
>
>
> Why on earth did you post this!!! IF YOU THINK FACTORIZATION IS SO
> EASY TRY FACTORING A 500+ DIGIT RSA MODULUS!! Then tell us hhoe easy
> it is to win the RSA factoring challenge. According to your reasoning,
> the trial-division algorithm is even *simpler*, but it is as slow as
> heck. The algorithm you posted (Pollard?) is only marginally better
> than trial-division, and unless I am mistaken, the algorithm is
> probablistic, meaning it is possible (but not likely) to never return.
> Do I need you to tell me that some factorization *ALGORITHMS* are
> simple? I did a whole research paper on it!!!
Interesting. I hope this research was better conducted that the way you
read (or not) his answer (Hint: for your information, this is really a
polynomial -time algrithm *on quantic computers*)
>
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: 1 QA engineer vs 7 users: opinions about the AXIOM computer algebra system"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Steven: "Re: JSH: Easy math, easy solution"
- Next in thread: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "no insults was Re: JSH: Easy math, easy solution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|