Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Russell: "Re: Problem with a number sequence."
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Thanks for the help on surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:40:17 -0600
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> Albert said:
>
>>Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>>
>>>Albert said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>>>This is so confused about the nature and purposes of a mathematical
>>>>>model and its relation to the real world that it's not even wrong. Start
>>>>>over.
>>>>
>>>>Apparently your reading list for the well-read, does not include
>>>>Gregory Bateson.
>>>
>>>Is that for me or Bob?
>>
>>It was aimed at Wolf in your defense.
>>
>>
>
> I don't get it but thanks! :)
Google for Gregory Bateson. I think you will like him.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: Russell: "Re: Problem with a number sequence."
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Thanks for the help on surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
