Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics
From: david petry (david_lawrence_petry_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: Proof factoring solution is closed form"
- Previous message: nlscb: "Thanks guys"
- In reply to: Robin Chapman: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Feb 2005 13:44:13 -0800
Robin Chapman wrote:
> It is clear from the outset that mathematics is not science.
> It's better than that :-)
I hesitate to ask, since I don't expect a sensible answer,
but...
In what sense is mathematics "better" than science?
In the same sense that art is better than reality? In the
sense that drug induced euphoria is better than reality?
And if your assertion was merely a joke, in what sense is
it funny?
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: Proof factoring solution is closed form"
- Previous message: nlscb: "Thanks guys"
- In reply to: Robin Chapman: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: article on schools of foundations of mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|