Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:23:07 -0500
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
> Yes, it was trivial, and assumed total ignorance on the part of the
> reader.
A safe assumption.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: does sqrt(2) exist in CM?"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
