Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/11/05 

Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:46:22 GMT

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:48:35 -0500, Tony Orlow (aeo6)
<aeo6@cornell.edu> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>robert j. kolker said:
>>
>>
>> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>> > Yes according to Cantorian cardinality. Nice regurgitation. Got it.
>>
>> Don't be nasty. I didn't regurgitate it. I re-derived it. I solve
>> difficult problems in set theory for amusement. However this was not
>> difficulat at all. It is really rather trivial.
>>
>> Bob Kolker
>>
>>
>Yes, it was trivial, and assumed total ignorance on the part of the
>reader. That kind of attitude on your part has earned you some
>nastiness, and mine certainly is not the worst you've seen, or spewed
>yourself.

Well put, Tony, and exactly right.

>Besides, regurgitation was a pretty apt term.
>--
>Smiles,
>
>Tony

Regards - Lester

Relevant Pages